Saturday, 11 August 2012

Round 17 Results

Launceston City 4 (J.Duncan 2, B.Kossman 2) def Northern Rangers 3 (M.Ambrose 2, T.Hingston)

Ulverstone 6 def Launceston 2

Riverside 1 drew Prospect Knights 1

Somerset 2 def Burnie 0

TEAM
P
W
D
L
F
A
Pts
Ulverstone
16
12
2
2
66
15
38
Northern Rangers
15
12
0
3
53
22
36
Devonport City
15
11
2
2
45
21
35
Riverside Olympic
15
5
5
5
25
34
20
Launceston City
15
5
3
6
22
37
18
Prospect Knights
15
5
2
8
20
33
17
Somerset
15
4
3
8
28
43
15
Launceston United
15
4
2
9
30
40
14
Burnie United
15
0
1
14
15
60
1

21 comments:

  1. Ulverstone +51 gd thanks to the main Mann, what a wrecking ball

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gee I'm sick of you posting about your self brayden, if you were really that good you would already be on the main land. Look at the league you play in, it's a joke. You would never been a goal scorer in the old state league. Maybe the Tasmanian diving team has room for you still.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i can tell you that i didnt post that!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Grow some balls Annon! Or are you too ashamed because Brayden probably slotted 5 or 6 past you/your team this year, hence you being the 'Joke'.

    ReplyDelete
  5. not that it means much Knights have 21 goals

    ReplyDelete
  6. First couple of guys must be taking the piss, surely. The first guy has been at it for weeks, and is just having some fun. I've been waiting for maaaanscape to be added in somewhere but he's let us down. Second guy must be kidding as well, as Brayden doesn't have to apologise for the league he plays in. You are kidding aren't you??

    ReplyDelete
  7. does the wrecking ball Mannscape does he, mann oh mann thats gross

    ReplyDelete
  8. To the annonymous comment re Mark Bakers send off, if your going to put those forward, you must put your full name to them. He again like others before him, deserves the right to reply to your face. Otherwise stick with the facts... And I dont know them, so I cant comment.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would personally like to thank all at Riverside on Saturday for the respect they showed throughout the day in what was tough for our club and the Reaney family.

    Cheers
    AB

    ReplyDelete
  10. And we wonder why we can not get players to stay playing soccer some of us bag,Criticize,and are just plain arseholes. When a young guy can go an play other sports an get a few buck in there pocket and be treated right an encouraged to play. Soccer in Tasmania needs to have a good hard look at itself so get off there back an give them a Lil support

    ReplyDelete
  11. Rangers to WIN title as Somerset will be filling there reserves for this match on the weekend.Not that it would matter though.Other than Ulvy people wanting them to win it does any one else want them to?I don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Find that very hard to believe

      Delete
    2. Why would they stack reserves??

      Delete
  12. I can tell you personally somerset willNOT be stacking their senior side with reserve players, after speaking to John this morning somerset are going to the NTCA to win the game just like any other match. Also the side they are putting out this week if nothing changes from today is as strong as ever...

    ReplyDelete
  13. well said Sam why would we not go out there with the aim of losing?? sure we mightn't be at our best this year or playing finals but all of the players still have pride for the club and themselves and want to finish the season off strongly... what a ridiculous comment

    ReplyDelete
  14. Somerset to win 1-0 or 0-0 draw! Ulverstone takes the title and celebrates with the whole NW coast :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  16. Patt,
    I commend you on being a man and putting your name to your thoughts and post, I was the one who removed your post and A.B's reply. I have had a couple of complaints and thought it is best to remove, nor do I agree or disagree that the post should have been removed but the person/ people in question don't need to reading or hearing this at this time.
    Yes I did post it too.

    ReplyDelete